BasicHttpBinding与WsHttpBinding与WebHttpBinding

「爱情、让人受尽委屈。」 2022-11-25 13:07 186阅读 0赞

本文翻译自：[BasicHttpBinding vs WsHttpBinding vs WebHttpBinding][]

*In WCF there are several different types of HTTP based bindings:* **在WCF中，有几种不同类型的基于HTTP的绑定：**

*  *[BasicHttpBinding][]* **[BasicHttpBinding][]**
 *  *[WsHttpBinding][]* **[WsHttpBinding][]**
 *  *[WebHttpBinding][]* **[WebHttpBinding][]**

*What are the differences among these 3?* **这3个之间有什么区别？**

*In particular what are the differences in terms of features / performance and compatability?* **特别是在功能/性能和兼容性方面有什么区别？**

--------------------

### \#1楼 ###

参考：[https://stackoom.com/question/b7AB/BasicHttpBinding与WsHttpBinding与WebHttpBinding][https_stackoom.com_question_b7AB_BasicHttpBinding_WsHttpBinding_WebHttpBinding]

--------------------

### \#2楼 ###

*You're comparing apples to oranges here:* **您在这里比较苹果和橙子：**

*  ***webHttpBinding** is the REST-style binding, where you basically just hit a URL and get back a truckload of XML or JSON from the web service* **webHttpBinding是REST样式的绑定，您基本上只需单击URL并从Web服务中获取大量XML或JSON**
 *  ***basicHttpBinding** and **wsHttpBinding** are two SOAP-based bindings which is quite different from REST.* **basicHttpBinding和wsHttpBinding是两个基于SOAP的绑定，与REST完全不同。** *SOAP has the advantage of having WSDL and XSD to describe the service, its methods, and the data being passed around in great detail (REST doesn't have anything like that - yet).* **SOAP的优点是可以使用WSDL和XSD来详细描述服务，其方法以及要传递的数据（REST还没有类似的东西）。** *On the other hand, you can't just browse to a wsHttpBinding endpoint with your browser and look at XML - you have to use a SOAP client, eg the WcfTestClient or your own app.* **另一方面，您不能只使用浏览器浏览到wsHttpBinding端点并查看XML-您必须使用SOAP客户端，例如WcfTestClient或您自己的应用程序。**

*So your first decision must be: REST vs. SOAP (or you can expose both types of endpoints from your service - that's possible, too).* **因此，您的第一个决定必须是：REST vs. SOAP（或者您也可以从服务中公开两种类型的端点-也可以）。**

*Then, between basicHttpBinding and wsHttpBinding, there differences are as follows:* **然后，在basicHttpBinding和wsHttpBinding之间，存在以下差异：**

*  *basicHttpBinding is the very basic binding - SOAP 1.1, not much in terms of security, not much else in terms of features - but compatible to just about any SOAP client out there --> great for interoperability, weak on features and security* **basicHttpBinding是非常基本的绑定-SOAP 1.1，在安全性方面没有多大的限制，在功能方面没有太多的其他限制-但与那里的任何SOAP客户端兼容->互操作性很好，功能和安全性较弱**
 *  *wsHttpBinding is the full-blown binding, which supports a ton of WS-\* features and standards - it has lots more security features, you can use sessionful connections, you can use reliable messaging, you can use transactional control - just a lot more stuff, but wsHttpBinding is also a lot \*heavier" and adds a lot of overhead to your messages as they travel across the network* **wsHttpBinding是成熟的绑定，它支持大量的WS- \*功能和标准-它具有更多的安全性功能，可以使用会话连接，可以使用可靠的消息传递，可以使用事务控制-只是更多的东西，但wsHttpBinding也“繁重”，并且在您的消息通过网络传播时会增加大量开销**

*For an in-depth comparison (including a table and code examples) between the two check out this codeproject article: [Differences between BasicHttpBinding and WsHttpBinding][]* **有关两者之间的深入比较（包括表和代码示例），请查看此代码项目文章： [BasicHttpBinding和WsHttpBinding之间的差异][Differences between BasicHttpBinding and WsHttpBinding]**

[BasicHttpBinding vs WsHttpBinding vs WebHttpBinding]: https://oldbug.net/q/b7AB/BasicHttpBinding-vs-WsHttpBinding-vs-WebHttpBinding
[BasicHttpBinding]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms731361.aspx
[WsHttpBinding]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms731299.aspx
[WebHttpBinding]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb412176.aspx
[https_stackoom.com_question_b7AB_BasicHttpBinding_WsHttpBinding_WebHttpBinding]: https://stackoom.com/question/b7AB/BasicHttpBinding%E4%B8%8EWsHttpBinding%E4%B8%8EWebHttpBinding
[Differences between BasicHttpBinding and WsHttpBinding]: http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/36396/Difference-between-BasicHttpBinding-and-WsHttpBind