Javascript中的变量声明语法（包括全局变量）之间的区别？

阳光穿透心脏的1/2处 2022-11-25 04:25 167阅读 0赞

本文翻译自：[Difference between variable declaration syntaxes in Javascript (including global variables)?][Difference between variable declaration syntaxes in Javascript _including global variables]

*Is there any difference between declaring a variable:* **声明变量之间有什么区别：**

var a=0; //1

*...this way:* **...这条路：**

a=0; //2

*...or:* **...要么：**

window.a=0; //3

*in global scope?* **在全球范围内？**

--------------------

### \#1楼 ###

参考：[https://stackoom.com/question/koSt/Javascript中的变量声明语法-包括全局变量-之间的区别][https_stackoom.com_question_koSt_Javascript_-_-]

--------------------

### \#2楼 ###

<title>Index.html</title>
    <script>
        var varDeclaration = true;
        noVarDeclaration = true;
        window.hungOnWindow = true;
        document.hungOnDocument = true;
    </script>
    <script src="external.js"></script>
    
    /* external.js */
    
    console.info(varDeclaration == true); // could be .log, alert etc
    // returns false in IE8
    
    console.info(noVarDeclaration == true); // could be .log, alert etc
    // returns false in IE8
    
    console.info(window.hungOnWindow == true); // could be .log, alert etc
    // returns true in IE8
    
    console.info(document.hungOnDocument == true); // could be .log, alert etc
    // returns ??? in IE8 (untested!)  *I personally find this more clugy than hanging off window obj

*Is there a global object that all vars are hung off of by default?* **是否有一个全局对象，默认情况下所有变量都挂起？** *eg: 'globals.noVar declaration'* **例如：“ globals.noVar声明”**

--------------------

### \#3楼 ###

*Bassed on the excellent answer of **TJ Crowder** : ( **Off-topic: Avoid cluttering `window`** )* **惊叹于TJ Crowder的出色回答：（ 题外话：避免`window`混乱 ）**

*This is an example of his idea:* **这是他的想法的一个例子：**

***Html*** **HTML**

<!DOCTYPE html>
    <html>
      <head>
        <script type="text/javascript" src="init.js"></script>
        <script type="text/javascript">
          MYLIBRARY.init(["firstValue", 2, "thirdValue"]);
        </script>
        <script src="script.js"></script>
      </head>
    
      <body>
        <h1>Hello !</h1>
      </body>    
    </html>

***init.js** (Based on [this answer][] )* **init.js （基于[此答案][this answer] ）**

***script.js*** **script.js**

// Here you can use the values defined in the html as if it were a global variable
    var a = "Hello World " + MYLIBRARY.helloWorld(2);
    
    alert(a);

*Here's the [plnkr][] .* **这是[plnkr][] 。** *Hope it help !* **希望对您有所帮助！**

--------------------

### \#4楼 ###

*In global scope there is no semantic difference.* **在全局范围内，没有语义差异。**

*But you really should avoid `a=0` since your setting a value to an undeclared variable.* **但是您确实应该避免`a=0`因为您将值设置为未声明的变量。**

*Also use closures to avoid editing global scope at all* **还使用闭包来避免完全编辑全局范围**

(function() {
       // do stuff locally
    
       // Hoist something to global scope
       window.someGlobal = someLocal
    }());

*Always use closures and always hoist to global scope when its absolutely neccesary.* **绝对必要时，请始终使用闭包，并始终将其提升到全局范围。** *You should be using asynchronous event handling for most of your communication anyway.* **无论如何，您应该在大多数通信中使用异步事件处理。**

*As @AvianMoncellor mentioned there is an IE bug with `var a = foo` only declaring a global for file scope.* **正如@AvianMoncellor提到的那样，有一个IE错误，其中`var a = foo`仅声明了文件范围的全局值。** *This is an issue with IE's notorious broken interpreter.* **这是IE臭名昭著的解释器的问题。** *This bug does sound familiar so it's probably true.* **这个错误听起来确实很熟悉，所以可能是事实。**

*So stick to `window.globalName = someLocalpointer`* **所以坚持`window.globalName = someLocalpointer`**

--------------------

### \#5楼 ###

*Yes, there are a couple of differences, though in practical terms they're not usually big ones.* **是的，有一些差异，尽管实际上它们通常并不大。**

*There's a fourth way, and as of ES2015 (ES6) there's two more.* **还有第四种方法，从ES2015（ES6）开始，还有另外两种方法。** *I've added the fourth way at the end, but inserted the ES2015 ways after \#1 (you'll see why), so we have:* **我在末尾添加了第四种方式，但是在＃1之后插入了ES2015方式（您会看到原因），因此我们有：**

var a = 0;     // 1
    let a = 0;     // 1.1 (new with ES2015)
    const a = 0;   // 1.2 (new with ES2015)
    a = 0;         // 2
    window.a = 0;  // 3
    this.a = 0;    // 4

### *Those statements explained* **这些陈述解释了** ###

***\#1 `var a = 0;`*** **＃1 `var a = 0;`**

*This creates a global variable which is also a property of the [global object][] , which we access as `window` on browsers (or via `this` a global scope, in non-strict code).* **这将创建一个全局变量，该变量也是[*全局对象*][global object]的属性，我们可以在浏览器中以`window`访问该变量（或通过`this` `window`在非严格代码中通过全局范围访问）。** *Unlike some other properties, the property cannot be removed via `delete` .* **与某些其他属性不同，该属性无法通过`delete` 。**

*In specification terms, it creates an identifier binding on the object [Environment Record][] for the [global environment][] .* **用规范的术语来说，它在[*全局环境*][global environment]的*对象[环境记录][Environment Record]*上创建一个*标识符绑定* 。** *That makes it a property of the global object because the global object is where identifier bindings for the global environment's object Environment Record are held.* **这使它成为全局对象的属性，因为全局对象是全局环境对象环境记录的标识符绑定所在的位置。** *This is why the property is non-deletable: It's not just a simple property, it's an identifier binding.* **这就是为什么该属性不可删除的原因：它不仅是一个简单的属性，还是一个标识符绑定。**

*The binding (variable) is defined before the first line of code runs (see "When `var` happens" below).* **绑定（变量）是在代码的第一行运行之前定义的（请参见下面的“何时发生`var` ”）。**

*Note that on IE8 and earlier, the property created on `window` is not enumerable (doesn't show up in `for..in` statements).* **请注意，在IE8和更早版本上，在`window`上创建的属性不可*枚举* （不会显示在`for..in`语句中）。** *In IE9, Chrome, Firefox, and Opera, it's enumerable.* **在IE9，Chrome，Firefox和Opera中，它是枚举的。**

--------------------

***\#1.1 `let a = 0;`*** **＃1.1 `let a = 0;`**

*This creates a global variable which is not a property of the global object.* **这将创建一个全局变量，该变量*不是*全局对象的属性。** *This is a new thing as of ES2015.* **从ES2015开始这是新事物。**

*In specification terms, it creates an identifier binding on the declarative Environment Record for the global environment rather than the object Environment Record.* **用规范术语来说，它在*声明性*环境记录上为全局环境而不是在*对象*环境记录上创建标识符绑定。** *The global environment is unique in having a split Environment Record, one for all the old stuff that goes on the global object (the object Environment Record) and another for all the new stuff ( `let` , `const` , and the functions created by `class` ) that don't go on the global object.* **全局环境的独特之处在于它具有分开的环境记录，一个环境记录适用于全局对象上所有的旧内容（ *对象*环境记录），另一个适用于所有新的内容（ `let` ， `const`和由`class`创建的函数），不要继续使用全局对象。**

*The binding is created before any step-by-step code in its enclosing block is executed (in this case, before any global code runs), but it's not accessible in any way until the step-by-step execution reaches the `let` statement.* **绑定是*在*执行其封闭块中的任何分步代码之前*创建的* （在这种情况下，在任何全局代码运行之前），但是在分步执行到达`let`语句之前，它无法以任何方式*访问* 。** *Once execution reaches the `let` statement, the variable is accessible.* **一旦执行到达`let`语句，就可以访问该变量。** *(See "When `let` and `const` happen" below.)* **（请参见下面的“当`let`和`const`发生时”。）**

--------------------

***\#1.2 `const a = 0;`*** **＃1.2 `const a = 0;`**

*Creates a global constant, which is not a property of the global object.* **创建一个全局常量，它不是全局对象的属性。**

*`const` is exactly like `let` except that you must provide an initializer (the `= value` part), and you cannot change the value of the constant once it's created.* **`const`就像`let`一样，除了必须提供一个初始化程序（ `= value`部分），并且一旦创建常量就无法更改其值。** *Under the covers, it's exactly like `let` but with a flag on the identifier binding saying its value cannot be changed.* **在幕后，它就像`let`一样，但是在标识符绑定上带有一个标志，表明其值不能更改。** *Using `const` does three things for you:* **使用`const`可以为您做三件事：**

1.  *Makes it a parse-time error if you try to assign to the constant.* **如果您尝试分配给常量，则使其成为解析时错误。**
2.  *Documents its unchanging nature for other programmers.* **记录其对于其他程序员的不变性。**
3.  *Lets the JavaScript engine optimize on the basis that it won't change.* **让JavaScript引擎在不改变的基础上进行优化。**

--------------------

***\#2 `a = 0;`*** **＃2 `a = 0;`**

*This creates a property on the global object implicitly .* **这将在全局对象上*隐式*创建一个属性。** *As it's a normal property, you can delete it.* **由于它是普通属性，因此可以将其删除。** *I'd recommend not doing this, it can be unclear to anyone reading your code later.* **我建议您*不*要这样做，以后再阅读您的代码的人可能会不清楚。** *If you use ES5's strict mode, doing this (assigning to a non-existent variable) is an error.* **如果您使用ES5的严格模式，则执行此操作（将其分配给不存在的变量）是错误的。** *It's one of several reasons to use strict mode.* **使用严格模式是多种原因之一。**

*And interestingly, again on IE8 and earlier, the property created not enumerable (doesn't show up in `for..in` statements).* **有趣的是，再次在IE8和更早版本上，创建的属性不可*枚举* （不会出现在`for..in`语句中）。** *That's odd, particularly given \#3 below.* **这很奇怪，特别是在下面的＃3中。**

--------------------

***\#3 `window.a = 0;`*** **＃3 `window.a = 0;`**

*This creates a property on the global object explicitly, using the `window` global that refers to the global object (on browsers; some non-browser environments have an equivalent global variable, such as `global` on NodeJS).* **这创建全局对象上的属性明确，使用`window` ，指的全局对象全局（在浏览器上;一些非浏览器环境具有等同的全局变量，诸如`global`上的NodeJS）。** *As it's a normal property, you can delete it.* **由于它是普通属性，因此可以将其删除。**

*This property **is** enumerable, on IE8 and earlier, and on every other browser I've tried.* **在IE8和更早版本以及我尝试过的所有其他浏览器上，此属性都是可枚举的。**

--------------------

***\#4 `this.a = 0;`*** **＃4 `this.a = 0;`**

*Exactly like \#3, except we're referencing the global object through `this` instead of the global `window` .* **就像＃3一样，除了我们通过`this`而不是global `window`引用全局对象。** *This won't work in strict mode, though, because in strict mode global code, `this` doesn't have a reference to the global object (it has the value `undefined` instead).* **这在严格模式是行不通的，但是，因为在严格模式全局代码， `this`不具有全局对象（它的价值的参考`undefined`代替）。**

--------------------

### *Deleting properties* **删除属性** ###

*What do I mean by "deleting" or "removing" `a` ?* **“删除”或“删除” `a`是什么意思？** *Exactly that: Removing the property (entirely) via the `delete` keyword:* **正是这样：通过`delete`关键字完全删除该属性：**

window.a = 0;
    display("'a' in window? " + ('a' in window)); // displays "true"
    delete window.a;
    display("'a' in window? " + ('a' in window)); // displays "false"

*`delete` completely removes a property from an object.* **`delete`完全删除对象的属性。** *You can't do that with properties added to `window` indirectly via `var` , the `delete` is either silently ignored or throws an exception (depending on the JavaScript implementation and whether you're in strict mode).* **通过`var`间接将属性添加到`window` ，您将无法做到这一点， `delete`会被静默忽略或引发异常（取决于JavaScript实现以及您是否处于严格模式）。**

***Warning** : IE8 again (and presumably earlier, and IE9-IE11 in the broken "compatibility" mode): It won't let you delete properties of the `window` object, even when you should be allowed to.* **警告 ：IE8再次出现（可能是更早的版本，而IE9-IE11处于损坏的“兼容性”模式）：即使允许，也不允许您删除`window`对象的属性。** *Worse, it throws an exception when you try ( [try this experiment][] in IE8 and in other browsers).* **更糟糕的是，尝试时会引发*异常* （在IE8和其他浏览器中[尝试此实验][try this experiment] ）。** *So when deleting from the `window` object, you have to be defensive:* **因此，从`window`对象中删除时，您必须采取防御措施：**

try {
        delete window.prop;
    }
    catch (e) {
        window.prop = undefined;
    }

*That tries to delete the property, and if an exception is thrown it does the next best thing and sets the property to `undefined` .* **尝试删除该属性，如果抛出异常，它将做第二件事，并将属性设置为`undefined` 。**

*This **only** applies to the `window` object, and only (as far as I know) to IE8 and earlier (or IE9-IE11 in the broken "compatibility" mode).* **这仅适用于`window`对象，并且仅（据我所知）适用于IE8和更早的版本（或处于“兼容”模式的IE9-IE11）。** *Other browsers are fine with deleting `window` properties, subject to the rules above.* **其他浏览器可以删除`window`属性，但要遵守上述规则。**

--------------------

### *When `var` happens* **当`var`发生时** ###

*The variables defined via the `var` statement are created before any step-by-step code in the execution context is run, and so the property exists well before the `var` statement.* **通过`var`语句定义的变量是在运行上下文中的*任何*逐步代码运行之前创建的，因此该属性在`var`语句*之前*就存在。**

*This can be confusing, so let's take a look:* **这可能会造成混淆，因此让我们看一下：**

display("foo in window? " + ('foo' in window)); // displays "true"
    display("window.foo = " + window.foo);          // displays "undefined"
    display("bar in window? " + ('bar' in window)); // displays "false"
    display("window.bar = " + window.bar);          // displays "undefined"
    var foo = "f";
    bar = "b";
    display("foo in window? " + ('foo' in window)); // displays "true"
    display("window.foo = " + window.foo);          // displays "f"
    display("bar in window? " + ('bar' in window)); // displays "true"
    display("window.bar = " + window.bar);          // displays "b"

***Live example:*** **现场示例：**

display("foo in window? " + ('foo' in window)); // displays "true" display("window.foo = " + window.foo); // displays "undefined" display("bar in window? " + ('bar' in window)); // displays "false" display("window.bar = " + window.bar); // displays "undefined" var foo = "f"; bar = "b"; display("foo in window? " + ('foo' in window)); // displays "true" display("window.foo = " + window.foo); // displays "f" display("bar in window? " + ('bar' in window)); // displays "true" display("window.bar = " + window.bar); // displays "b" function display(msg) { var p = document.createElement('p'); p.innerHTML = msg; document.body.appendChild(p); }

*As you can see, the symbol `foo` is defined before the first line, but the symbol `bar` isn't.* **如您所见，符号`foo`在第一行之前定义，但符号`bar`未定义。** *Where the `var foo = "f";`* **其中`var foo = "f";`** *statement is, there are really two things: defining the symbol, which happens before the first line of code is run;* **声明实际上有两件事：定义符号，它发生在代码的第一行运行之前；** *and doing an assignment to that symbol, which happens where the line is in the step-by-step flow.* **并对该符号进行赋值，该操作会在分步流程中的直线处发生。** *This is known as " `var` hoisting" because the `var foo` part is moved ("hoisted") to the top of the scope, but the `foo = "f"` part is left in its original location.* **这被称为“ `var` hoisting”，因为`var foo`部分已移动（“提升”）到范围的顶部，但是`foo = "f"`部分保留在其原始位置。** *(See [Poor misunderstood `var`][Poor misunderstood _var] on my anemic little blog.)* **（见[*可怜的误解`var`*][Poor misunderstood _var]在我的贫血小博客。）**

--------------------

### *When `let` and `const` happen* **当`let`和`const`发生时** ###

*`let` and `const` are different from `var` in a couple of ways.* **`let`和`const`在几个方面与`var`不同。** *The way that's relevant to the question is that although the binding they define is created before any step-by-step code runs, it's not accessible until the `let` or `const` statement is reached.* **与该问题相关的方式是，尽管它们定义的绑定是在任何分步代码运行之前创建的，但是直到到达`let`或`const`语句之后，才能*访问*该绑定。**

*So while this runs:* **因此，在运行时：**

display(a);    // undefined
    var a = 0;
    display(a);    // 0

*This throws an error:* **这将引发错误：**

display(a);    // ReferenceError: a is not defined
    let a = 0;
    display(a);

*The other two ways that `let` and `const` differ from `var` , which aren't really relevant to the question, are:* **`let`和`const`与`var`不同的其他两种方式与问题无关，它们是：**

1.  *`var` always applies to the entire execution context (throughout global code, or throughout function code in the function where it appears), but `let` and `const` apply only within the block where they appear.* **`var`始终应用于整个执行上下文（遍历全局代码，或出现在函数中的整个函数代码），但`let`和`const`仅适用于它们出现的*块*内。** *That is, `var` has function (or global) scope, but `let` and `const` have block scope.* **也就是说， `var`具有函数（或全局）作用域，而`let`和`const`具有块作用域。**
2.  *Repeating `var a` in the same context is harmless, but if you have `let a` (or `const a` ), having another `let a` or a `const a` or a `var a` is a syntax error.* **在相同的上下文中重复`var a`是无害的，但是如果`let a` （或`const a` ），则让另一个`let a`或`const a`或`var a`是语法错误。**

*Here's an example demonstrating that `let` and `const` take effect immediately in their block before any code within that block runs, but aren't accessible until the `let` or `const` statement:* **这是一个示例，演示`let`和`const`在该块中的任何代码运行之前立即在其块中生效，但是直到`let`或`const`语句才可访问：**

var a = 0;
    console.log(a);
    if (true)
    {
      console.log(a); // ReferenceError: a is not defined
      let a = 1;
      console.log(a);
    }

*Note that the second `console.log` fails, instead of accessing the `a` from outside the block.* **请注意，第二个`console.log`失败，而不是从块外部访问`a` 。**

--------------------

### *Off-topic: Avoid cluttering the global object ( `window` )* **离题：避免使全局对象（ `window` ）混乱** ###

*The `window` object gets very, very cluttered with properties.* **`window`对象的属性变得非常混乱。** *Whenever possible, strongly recommend not adding to the mess.* **只要有可能，强烈建议不要增加混乱。** *Instead, wrap up your symbols in a little package and export at most one symbol to the `window` object.* **而是将符号包装在一个小包装中，并将*最多*一个符号导出到`window`对象。** *(I frequently don't export any symbols to the `window` object.) You can use a function to contain all of your code in order to contain your symbols, and that function can be anonymous if you like:* **（我经常不将*任何*符号导出到`window`对象。）您可以使用函数包含所有代码以包含符号，并且如果您愿意，该函数可以是匿名的：**

(function() {
        var a = 0; // `a` is NOT a property of `window` now
    
        function foo() {
            alert(a);   // Alerts "0", because `foo` can access `a`
        }
    })();

*In that example, we define a function and have it executed right away (the `()` at the end).* **在该示例中，我们定义了一个函数并立即执行它（最后是`()` ）。**

*A function used in this way is frequently called a scoping function .* **以这种方式使用的函数通常称为*作用域函数* 。** *Functions defined within the scoping function can access variables defined in the scoping function because they're closures over that data (see: [Closures are not complicated][] on my anemic little blog).* **在作用域函数定义的，因为他们是在该数据*关闭*的作用域函数可以访问的变量中定义的函数（见： [*瓶盖并不复杂*][Closures are not complicated]在我贫血的小博客）。**

--------------------

### \#6楼 ###

*Keeping it simple :* **保持简单：**

a = 0

*The code above gives a global scope variable* **上面的代码提供了一个全局范围变量**

var a = 0;

*This code will give a variable to be used in the current scope, and under it* **该代码将给出一个变量，该变量将在当前作用域及其下使用**

window.a = 0;

*This generally is same as the global variable.* **这通常与全局变量相同。**

[Difference between variable declaration syntaxes in Javascript _including global variables]: https://oldbug.net/q/koSt/Difference-between-variable-declaration-syntaxes-in-Javascript-including-global-variables
[https_stackoom.com_question_koSt_Javascript_-_-]: https://stackoom.com/question/koSt/Javascript%E4%B8%AD%E7%9A%84%E5%8F%98%E9%87%8F%E5%A3%B0%E6%98%8E%E8%AF%AD%E6%B3%95-%E5%8C%85%E6%8B%AC%E5%85%A8%E5%B1%80%E5%8F%98%E9%87%8F-%E4%B9%8B%E9%97%B4%E7%9A%84%E5%8C%BA%E5%88%AB
[this answer]: https://stackoverflow.com/a/2190927/2954267
[plnkr]: http://plnkr.co/edit/iE0Vr7sszfqrrDIsR8Wi?p=preview
[global object]: http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/6.0/index.html#sec-global-object
[Environment Record]: http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/6.0/index.html#sec-environment-records
[global environment]: http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/6.0/index.html#sec-global-environment-records
[try this experiment]: http://jsbin.com/enayud
[Poor misunderstood _var]: http://blog.niftysnippets.org/2008/03/poor-misunderstood-var.html
[Closures are not complicated]: http://blog.niftysnippets.org/2008/02/closures-are-not-complicated.html